What a laugh, cycling campaign news these days.
Sarcasm knows no bounds on Freedom Cycle.
Here we go.
You will not be surprised to learn that the government continues to massively under fund their own
Active Travel Policy for cycling and walking, providing only £2bn when between
£6bn and £8bn is required.
This follows the unveiling of England's second Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy recently. I think this was a reworking of the first strategy which became necessary as a result of the government tweaking their forecasts upwards for the projected increase in numbers cycling.
Pointless, if the whole show remains underfunded, as it does.
I can only imagine that ministers put their fingers in their ears when they ask how much a project cost. They are told, between £6bn and £8bn. And they say, Ah, £2bn.
You say, no, between £6bn and £8bn.
They say, right, that's £2bn.
And so it goes on.
The national cyclists' organisation, Cycling UK have once again seen fit to inform
their membership that the government continues to under fund cycling, as they have done since the beginning of time.
In response, Cycling UK promise to do what they can with the
help of the Department for Transport’s cycling team working their magic and who
remain steadfast.
Cycling UK’s Policy Director, Roger Geffen complained last
week that the government’s plans include “warm words but lack cash.” Nothing new there.
He gives a
very full and account of the intricate and detailed studies underpinning the
government’s target to increase cycling over a number of years. You can sense
his frustration in trying to understand just why it is the government
repeatedly comes up short with the cash.
Geffen has been tirelessly lobbying ministers for years over this.
Anyone else fighting this hopeless war would by now have handed in their notice claiming post traumatic stress.
Although funding has dramatically increased from the dark
90s, when the national cycling policy was launched with no money, it has
consistently fallen well short of what is required.
There is no explanation fcr this. Government has frequently stated it agrees with all the increased benefits to be had from having greater numbers cycling. It even goes so far as to announce grand targets, setting government staff to work with Cycling UK to make it happen.
But then they fail to come up with enough money to see the job through.
It was ever thus. In my book providing a side-long look at
our sport and pastime I say that Britain, which has never had a transport
policy, will never provide decent funding to make the roads safer for cycling.
The chapter “The marriage of success to failure” recalls how
British cycling’s meteoric rise to become Tour de France champions and top
ranked Olympic nation in 2012 contrasts with the woeful and continuing lack of
funding to make the roads safer.
Meanwhile, another load of bollocks at local level, as Eastbourne (not Littlehampton as mistakenly written when this was first posted) has included cycling in a traffic ban from Terminus Street, an important shopping centre in the town
centre.
Cycling UK is looking into this matter and will likely mount
a legal challenge in a bid to overturn the decision. Meanwhile, there is to
be judicial review of the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea’s hasty
decision to take out a popular Pop-Up cycling lane. They did this to pacify local resistance
stirred up by their local VIP – or should that be RIP - the actor Nigel Havers
known for his portrayal of classical English gentlemen with a hatred of cyclists.
On the world stage a story which broke this week informs us
that Oil giants Exxon and Mobil, in partnership with President Bush, 30 years ago began running a successful PR
campaign to discredit Climate Change Science which pins the blame for the
extreme weather and heat we are now beginning to experience on 200 years of
burning carbon.
The rich fuel companies, fearing poverty if we give up the
oil fields, have been sowing seeds of doubt in the science and are trying to
convince us all we can’t live without oil.
They promote America
for Prosperity, fuelling (no pun intended) fears that cutting carbon use will
drastically reduce quality of life – which it will of course. Whereas the other course of action they recommend,
to do nothing, will, according to the science, eventually kill us.
They are saying that
talk of wild fires, flooding as the sea rises, increased heat waves killing
crops, the likely massive migration from the south, which will bear the brunt
of this first, to the north, has got
nothing to do with burning oil. I’d love to believe them.
I read recently that the popular press here in the UK is
also to begin a campaign discrediting the scientists.
These are same newspapers who champion Brexshit which,
according to sane newspapers few in the UK read, is responsible for the Dover
chaos. Those long delays for travellers at the Port of Dover are the result, it
is claimed, of Brexit which ended freedom of travel and has led to increased
bureaucracy at custom checks.
Finally, the recent Tour de France did its “green”
credentials no good when officials aggressively removed teenage climate change
protestors who blocked the route delaying the race. Once upon a time, Tour
organisers embraced protestors who routinely stopped the race to bring their
woes to the wider public.
But not French star Bernard Hinault who, when Paris-Nice was
stopped by striking dock workers, rode full tilt into the human blockage and
landed a punch on their spokesman saying: “I don’t interfere
with your work, so don’t you interfere with mine.”
.jpg)
