It is hardly worth me commenting on. Except to say its
further evidence to support my belief that no British government will ever
provide decent funding to support a network of town and city and urban cycling
routes necessary to reduce congestion and pollution. And I’ve reported on this
shit fest for 50 years.
Royce Road cycling and walking crossing, Manchester. Will the cut in cycling budget put an end to such innovative schemes? |
According to Cycling UK, the national cycling
organisation, the active travel funding has been reduced from £3.8bn to £3bn in
England. This means, say Cycling UK, that “there is no way the English
Government can meet its own target that 50% of journeys in towns and cities
should be walked or cycled by 2030.”
Here's a time line of a few ideas which
have come and gone. In 1996 the Conservatives launched the National Cycling
Strategy to great acclaim - except there was no funding for it. Until some years
later when under a Labour government, £5m - a pittance - was provided and
Cycling England was born, to encourage Cycling Development Towns.
The funding was increased a number of times, but still ranked as peanuts in the great scheme of things.
Nevertheless, with what
little money they had towns willing to take part in this venture were helped to
develop a cycling scheme which most suited them, perhaps a short cycling lane to
a school, or cycle parking. It proved a huge success in generating cycling
showing that if cycling was provided for it would put bums on bikes. In all
something like 27 towns took part.
Then along came a Conservative government
wanting to save money and they killed Cycling England - together with a load of
other Quangos set up to deliver various policies. In 2013 we had the acclaimed
"Get Britain Cycling" report, welcomed by prime minister David Cameron who spoke
glowingly of it.
Would he now provide funding for it? Oh, no, he said. Get
Britain Cycling should be left to the Local Authorities to implement, he said.
Even though we all knew the LA's in most cases lacked the political will, the
money and the expertise of get the job done.
And now fate has seen to it that
the Active Travel Policy has been seriously injured by the Conservatives
pleading they had no choice but to reduce costs. The government blames the cost
of living crisis, the Ukraine war and short-lived former Prime Minister Liz
Truss’s bombshell economic plan which plunged the UK into financial nightmare.
This of course suits their purpose.
It must have come as a great relief to those
pulling government strings for the excellent Active Travel policy to be
seriously injured in this way. It follows a pattern where they first bow to
pressure to provide vocal support for cycling policy, then when put under
further pressure they provide funding but too little to properly do the job and
then, as is so often the case, cut the funding due to...oh, any number of
excuses.
They probably only put up the Active Travel Policy in the first place –
together with all their other so-called carbon-reducing initiatives – because of
pressure to do so. But what concerns them most are policies which may lose them
votes from the fickle mindless majority. So cutting funding for Active Travel
conveniently means they avoid what they have always feared the most, a voting
backlash from the motoring public stirred up by the tabloid press, fearing loss
of road space to cyclists. It was ever thus.
What a contrast to last month's article on Holland.
ReplyDelete