BREXIT or Bike-it? asks Cycling UK
With the general election next week, Cycling UK are
calling on cyclists to ask their local MP to press Government for the £billions
needed to fund active travel to help stave off climate change and pollution.
They know full well that we are all consumed by a terrible
angst with the long running Brexit farce with no end.
But taking the long view,
whatever becomes of Brexit, the government must still be persuaded to
address climate change and pollution before the Thames floods Parliament and one way of doing so is by pumping £billions into making the roads safer
for cycling.
I'll believe it when I see it, says Bingers |
Well, I think we know the present government’s response to
that one! Nevertheless, nothing ventured, nothing gained.
In fact Labour’s election manifesto promises massive
investment, the Liberals offer is pretty good while the Conservative’s budget
for cycling remains typically poor.
The indefatigable Paul Tuohy, Chief Executive of Cycling
UK, says whatever your position on Brexit, lobby your MP to press for the sustained
government investment needed.
There was nothing in the last Budget for this.
Currently, about 2 per cent of the transport budget goes
to cycling. It needs to be at least 5 per cent.
So, do as Paul asks, write to your MP about this. (Or
email if you no longer possess pen and
paper)
You never know, one day the government may fulfil their
own modest target to double cycle use which at present ain’t going to happen
because their own active travel policy is all but inactive.
What the three main political parties promise
to spend on cycling in their election manifesto
The Guardian Bike Blog has it all in greater detail. You
can read an edited version here
courtesy of The
Guardian News and Media.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2019/dec/01/which-partys-general-election-pledges-are-best-for-cyclists
From the Guardian Bike Blog…
The Walking and Cycling Alliance wants £17 per person per year to be spent on active travel, rising to £34 per person by 2025. Spending is currently £7 per person annually.
Conservative
Main pledges:
A £350m cycling infrastructure fund over five years (£70m a year), and “tough
new design standards, which must be followed to receive any money”; a £2bn
pothole fund; Bikeability training for every child; pilots of low-traffic
“healthy neighbourhoods” to reduce rat running on residential streets, with
increased provision “for separated bike lanes on main roads”; trials
incentivising GPs to prescribe bicycles or bicycle hire to patients. There is
mention of a “long-term cycling programme and budget like the roads programme
and budget, though of course smaller”, though it is unclear if that refers to
the £350m or something longer-term.
Funding pledge on cycling: £70m per year, each year of the new parliament;
total £350m.
Per head per year: £1.18 – so less than the current spend.
However, £350m over five years is tiny in transport terms and pales in comparison to what other parties are offering. Manchester alone needs £1.4bn for its city-wide cycling and walking programme.
Labour
Main pledges: £50 per head per year on cycling by the end of the term, amounting to £7.2bn a year. Deliver 5,000km (3,100 miles) of cycleways within the first term; provide safe cycling and walking routes to 10,000 primary schools; £200 grants for e-bike purchase and support for an “e-bike valley” industrial cluster. Bring back Cycling (and now also Walking) England, axed in the bonfire of the quangos, to deliver councils’ plans. Doubling of Bikeability funding to cover all primary school children, plus secondary school children, and adults. Fully fund the Cycling and Walking Investment Strategy which sets targets to double cycling by adults and children by 2025. Cycling and bicycles on prescription; a “cycling and walking social investment fund” to support active travel in “left-behind areas”.
Main pledges:
Spending 10% of the transport budget on cycling by the end of a five-year
parliament. More devolution and power to councils to make decisions; using the
planning process to reduce car dependency in new developments. “A national
strategy to promote cycling and walking, including the creation of dedicated
safe cycling lanes”; placing a far higher priority on encouraging walking and
cycling; reducing car use; integration of rail, bus and cycle routes.
Funding pledge on cycling: 10% of
the transport budget by the end of a five-year parliament.
Summary: Light
on detail, though a commitment of 10% of the transport budget is an ambitious
target.
No comments:
Post a Comment